Monday, August 15, 2022 at 7:00 PM• Rian Rosendaal

A very important period has already begun for PSV. The diptych with Rangers in the play-offs of the Champions League is on the program. Will the team of coach Ruud van Nistelrooij manage to hold their own on Tuesday evening at the always atmospheric Ibrox? In collaboration with Unibet, Voetbalzone looks ahead to PSV’s visit to Glasgow.

PSV’s Champions League adventure almost came to an end last week, as AS Monaco led 1-2 in the Philip Stadium with one minute left on the clock. Érick Gutiérrez brought the PSV fans into ecstasy with a late equalizer, after which Luuk de Jong took the win with a nice header goal in extra time. The European success was continued on Saturday in Deventer. Thanks in part to an excellent Xavi Simons, Go Ahead Eagles was defeated 2-5.

Do you see PSV winning the first meeting with Rangers? The odds are 2.90!

Rangers had a great night at Ibrox last week. Royale Union Saint-Gillis was defeated 3-0 and that was enough after the 2-0 defeat on Belgian soil. What followed was an easy 4-0 win over St Johnstone. With a view to the clash with PSV, manager Giovanni van Bronckhorst kept permanent staff Tom Lawrence, Scott Arfield, Malik Tillman and Ryan Kent on the bench. Except for Kent, these players were used as substitutes.

Do you think Rangers is too strong for PSV on their own field? A win can be played at an odd of 2.55!

At Rangers, a lot seems to depend on Antonio Colak from an attacking point of view. The summer signing has scored three goals in his first five games on behalf of the Scottish powerhouse. De Jong scored one goal less in the PSV shirt, although that included the winning goal against Monaco. As a result, the Eindhoven team is another step towards the big goal: placement for the group stage of the Champions League.

Is Luuk de Jong also the great hero of PSV against Rangers? Check out the odds!

What does gambling cost you? Stop on time. 18+
Receive €40 in free bets on €10 bet. Register on Unibet.nl!

Related

More sports news

0 comments


Reply

It is not possible to respond to this document.